 |
 |
 |
|
|
GEOENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION
The
following are representative projects performed by personnel of Engineering
Analytics, Inc.
-
Groundwater Treatment System Design Construction and Operation, Fullerton,
California
-
Multiple Site Assessments and Remediation, Cape Canaveral, Florida
-
PCB Assessments
at Multiple Sites, Eastern United States
-
Railyard
Assessment and Remediation, Lakeland, Florida
-
Soil and
Groundwater Remediation, Escondido, California
-
Superfund Site
Remediation, St. David, Arizona
-
Groundwater
Assessment and Treatment, Pensacola, Florida
-
Closure of
Chromium Site, Elizabeth, New Jersey
-
Chlorinated
Solvent Assessment and Remediation, Orlando, Florida
Click
Here to download
our SOQ of Geoenvironmental Site Assessment and Remediation Project Sheet.
|
RELATED LINKS:
EA provides management
consulting and technical services in four principal business areas:
|
|
GROUNDWATER TREATMENT
SYSTEM DESIGN CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION, FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Engineering Analytics
staff provided engineering services for the design, construction and operation
of a 600 gallon per minute (gpm) groundwater treatment system at the Hughes
Aircraft Company (HAC), Ground Systems Group Facility in Fullerton, California.
The design included extraction and treatment of contaminated groundwater and
subsequent re-injection at a location downgradient of the site in order to
provide a hydraulic barrier to contain the groundwater plume. An innovative
system of six intersecting horizontal wells replaced over 90 vertical wells in
the main groundwater plume area. The treatment train consisted of a 43-foot tall
air stripping tower, as well as liquid and vapor phase carbon adsorbers. Four
injection wells, located one-half mile downgradient, were used to re-introduce
the treated water to the groundwater system.
|
|
|
|
MULTIPLE SITE
ASSESSMENTS AND REMEDIATION, CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA
|
|
|
|
Engineering Analytics
staff directed the assessment of more than 20 potentially hazardous sites at
Cape Canaveral Air Station Florida. Included in the site investigations were
five former Launch Complexes, and numerous support facilities. Contaminant
concerns ranged from petroleum to chlorinated solvents and heavy metals.
Assessment activities included soil and groundwater sampling, soil gas sampling,
borehole logging, hydrogeologic testing, and use of geophysics (e.g.
ground-penetrating radar) and other innovative assessment techniques such as
Membrane Interface Probes (MIP) and Waterloo® samplers. EA staff directed
remediation activities at several of these sites including soil removal and
capping, groundwater extraction and treatment, design and installation of air
sparging walls, and soil vapor extraction.
|
|
|
|
PCB ASSESSMENTS AT MULTIPLE SITES, EASTERN UNITED STATES
|
|
|
|
Engineering Analytics staff
directed a PCB assessment for a major natural gas pipeline extending from the
Gulf of Mexico to the northeastern U.S. The program included collection of soil,
groundwater, surface water, sediment, and biota samples according to very strict
USEPA protocol. EA staff coordinated more than ten sampling teams working in
eight States to ensure consistency in approach and adherence to the sampling
protocols. Because of the tendency of PCB’s to accumulate in living organisms,
innovative approaches to sampling biota from frogs to grazing cattle were
developed. This “indicator species” sampling strategy was developed, in part, by
EA personnel and resulted in extensive cost savings by reducing the number of
samples that were collected by up to 40 percent.
|
|
|
|
RAILYARD ASSESSMENT
AND REMEDIATION, LAKELAND, FLORIDA
|
|
|
|
Engineering Analytics staff directed the assessment of a more than 100-acre
railyard in Lakeland, Florida. The primary risk driver was arsenic. Previous
consultants had collected more than 300 samples, but were unable to address the
regulatory concerns. The site was being re-developed as a Brownfield’s property,
and EA staff were asked to expedite the assessment process with a limited number
of samples. Using an innovative statistical approach that combined site drainage
conditions with detailed operations maps, the assessment was completed to the
satisfaction of the regulators in just 3 months with approximately 50 additional
samples being collected. This allowed site re-development to proceed on
schedule.
|
|
|
|
SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
REMEDIATION, ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA |
|
|
|
Engineering Analytics staff designed, installed, and operated a treatment plant
to extract and treat groundwater contaminated with PCE, TCE, and other VOCs. The
treatment plant used a UV/chemical oxidation system to destroy the contaminants.
A soil vapor extraction system was installed providing treatment of the vadose
zone soils. Shallow soils contaminated with PCBs and heavy metals were excavated
and removed from the site. A soil cover was placed over the entire site to limit
the potential for wind-blown contaminants escaping, and to prevent trespasssers
from coming in contact with the contaminated soil.
|
|
|
|
SUPERFUND SITE
REMEDIATION, ST. DAVID, ARIZONA
Apache Powder Superfund Site, St. David, Arizona |
|
|
|
Engineering Analytics staff prepared the RI/FS and remedial design for six areas
of contamination at the Apache Powder Superfund Site. Contaminants of concern
included nitrates and perchlorates, arsenic, and the explosives 2,4-DNT and
2,6-DNT, TNT, and PETN. Soil contamination was remediated by excavation, on-site
open burning or detonation, and off-site disposal. Groundwater was treated by
constructing a 4.5-acre wetland. The treatment wetland was designed as a gravity
flow treatment system capable of treating 210 gpm. Treated groundwater was
returned to the San Pedro River. The treatment wetland saved the owners over
$40M over the next lowers cost treatment options.
|
|
|
|
GROUNDWATER
ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT, PENSACOLA, FLORIDA |
|
|
|
EA staff completed a detailed geochemical assessment to determine why arsenic
levels were elevated downgradient of a closed landfill. The results indicated
that anoxic conditions, brought about by the presence of landfill waste, had
initiated a series of chemical reactions that resulted in the mobilization of
arsenic and iron downgradient of the site. These elements were then discharged
to a nearby creek, resulting in unsightly red staining and a reduction in the
number and type of biota inhabiting the creek. EA staff developed an innovative,
passive remedy that involved collection of rainwater from the landfill surface
and construction of aerated ponds downgradient of the landfill. The oxygen-rich
rainfall was conveyed to the ponds, where further oxidation using aerators was
completed. The highly-oxygenated water infiltrated into shallow groundwater
through the ponds, thereby immobilizing the arsenic in-situ at a fraction of the
cost of an active pump-and-treat system.
|
|
|
|
CLOSURE OF CHROMIUM
SITE, ELIZABETH NEW JERSEY |
|
|
|
Engineering Analytics staff completed the first successful natural attenuation
demonstration for chromium in the State of New Jersey, thereby saving their
client several million dollars. The geochemical demonstration used an
non-traditional “assimilative capacity” analysis to make the case that the
amount of iron available naturally in the soils surrounding the chromium
contamination was many times greater than the amount necessary to bind up all of
the free chromium. The analysis showed that the chromium would never be released
to a nearby surface water body, and, over time, would become more and more
tightly bound, preventing any future release scenario.
|
|
|
|
CHLORINATED SOLVENT
ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION, ORLANDO, FLORIDA |
|
|
|
Engineering Analytics
personnel were responsible for the assessment and remediation of a chlorinated
solvent groundwater plume in Orlando, Florida. The remediation process consisted
of a three-phase treatment system. Contaminated groundwater was injected with a
buffer to control pH, followed by lactate (food source) and a bacterial culture
KB-1® designed to dehalogenate chlorinated solvents. The injection system was
designed so as to re-circulate the injectate, thereby saving costs on both
treatment and additional additives. Within one year, total halogenated compound
concentrations had decreased (on average) by more than 75%.
|
|
|
Home
|
About EA |
Services
|
Projects |
Publications | Directions | Contact Us |
Site Map |
|
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
1600 Specht Point Road, Suite 209
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
Phone: (970) 488-3111
Fax: (970) 488-3112
©
2012
Engineering Analytics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
| |